@JourneymanGeek oh yeah. from that POV, I definitely agree. it's not the best experience for new chat users exploring the list of existing rooms. and I think that experience is really worth considering.
at the same time, I also enjoy that rooms have fun names. if I had a room for people to chat with me like a "starball's den", it would probably have "nebula" in it or something.
@JourneymanGeek I do think you have a point, but kind of curious to see all the "hi" in Javascript, and then ** crickets ** chat.stackoverflow.com/rooms/17/javascript Maybe it's not active enough? Seems fairly active at certain times of day.
@EmmaBee well, how long have those people known the room exists? maybe for some, what it takes to want to start engaging in conversation is just lurking more first.
@starball Very recent! This is folks who are discovering chat in the last week. More just an interesting observation in what happens when people join chat. I agree about lurking. I am way more lurker than engager, at first. What about you?
@PetəíŕdtheWizard ^(\+[\uD835][\uDC00-\uDFFF]{1,2}.?)?(?([\uD835][\uDC00-\uDFFF]){3})?.?([\uD835][\uDC00-\uDFFF]){3}.?([\uD835][\uDC00-\uDFFF]){4}$ this should catch all spam look alike phone number like +𝟙↹𝟠𝟠𝟘⇄𝟜𝟛𝟝⇄𝟙𝟡𝟘𝟙 (altered)
Simply put, because we don't have a perma-ban feature that just says "this account is banned forever" with no timeline for when it ends. We never thought we'd actually need something like that, and cases like this are still incredibly rare. At least rare enough that investing time in another type...
Whenever the topic of a suspended user crops up, there's often confusion about what information moderators ought to share and what they should keep private. Sometimes moderators are just as unsure as other users. This can cause all sorts of unnecessary problems.
The immediate effect of a suspensi...
@Tinkeringbell I'll drop it as @Mithical got rid of the chat, but I just tried it in a different room, and that indeed works. For some reason I thought you couldn't, but that's neat, thanks.
Unrelated, but anyone know why I can kick myself out of a room? Is that useful for something?
Oh, it says this:
> Really, you want you kick you yourself? I suggest a long walk instead.
@A-Tech I'm not looking up the Unicode to check that but note that periods in regex don't match new lines. Considering it's for markdown, .{3} also wouldn't match <invisibletagshenannigans>.
i don't like that it doesn't delete the posts in the list
:shrug:
if i'm deleting a list it's because i want to delete the list,
not because i want to move everything to the default list
it's intuitive that deleting a collection will delete the things in the collection, it's not intuitive that it will move everything in the collection into a different collection
@EmmaBee I expect people to lurk a bit in chat before diving in. Or at least to browse the transcripts to get a feel for the culture & typical conversations. But maybe I'm a bit old-fashioned. ;) I can't blame people for expecting to be able to just dive in & behave like they do in the other social spaces they're familiar with.
@Jeremy A few of us lost points today, due to the deletion of a popular senior member of the community...
@EmmaB In the SO Python room, we had a new visitor who seemed disappointed that clicking the new Chat button brought him to an old-fashioned chat room, not a modern GenAI chatbot.
And several of our new visitors remarked that they were surprised that the chat rooms seemed very old-fashioned. A few of us remarked that we like the simple old-fashioned style...
Some of us like the old style. ;) We're happy to work in a text terminal. We like editors that we can explicitly control rather than WYSIWYG systems that force you to surrender control.
@PM2Ring but what I found interesting was the loss of just 2 points. Maybe it means that I downvoted that person 2 times, but I have not downvoted at all on that site, and don't have the critic badge there. It looks like I lost the 2 points from a successful edit. Is that even possible?
As Answered by @animuson and I quote:
You actually lose reputation for suggested edits where the user removed was the final approver of the edit, because their user ID
gets recorded on the "vote" which gives you the reputation. It doesn't
revert all reputation you've gained from suggested...
It looks like I have the critic badge on that site, but no downvotes. I hate when I get the critic badge for having a fat thumb that clicks downvote then changes it to upvote.
So I guess a question they asked on that site, and maybe 3 that they asked on this site, for which I had approved edits, were removed. Or, that user was the final approver of the 4 edits.
Today I noticed that my reputation got truncated by 64 points, and when I looked at my reputation history, I saw a bunch of lines notifying me of points removal along to a "user was removed" message. Each has a slightly different timestamp, ranging from 12:39:04 to 12:39:43.
I can't find the q...
I use "forced" dark mode on my phone, which can make it very hard to see if I've up or down voted. Sometimes I accidentally vote on stuff while scrolling with my thumb. Mostly, I notice it & fix it straight away, but not always. A couple of months ago, I was revisiting a recent question page and was shocked to see I'd downvoted an answer that I would never have consciously downvoted. Oops. :(
Chromium-based browsers support a feature flag about:flags/#enable-force-dark to force a dark theme on sites. Over the years this feature has existed, we've gotten many bug reports of things not working right when this flag is used (example; also see reports under the dark-mode tag).
It's known t...
It's tricky to support it properly because a browser in forced dark mode responds to media queries as if it's using a light theme. You can test that with the examples on developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@media/… Also, the various Chromium-based browsers have idiosyncratic ways of implementing the light-dark inversions. — PM 2RingMay 15, 2024 at 4:44
;)
The Samsung Internet forced dark mode is particularly difficult. It does some really bizarre stuff, especially with SVG. Eg, it applies different rules to rectangles drawn with <rect> vs <path>. It's pretty annoying. But I need dark mode, otherwise I get headaches, watery eyes, etc.
@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog I'm sad to see him go as well. My only concern is that such a post will get into mass speculation about the reasons for his network suspension/his choice to delete his account. I'd really rather not see such a post devolve into that.
I'll wait for others to weigh in with their 2 cents. I'm not saying "No that's not allowed", just trying to be cautious about the potential for drama :/
@Spevacus That's true. I also noticed that his personal chat room was hard deleted from this server, i.e., no record in the room list and not even visible to 10k+ users who otherwise have the privilege to see deleted rooms.
@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog I'll share what I can: Staff were involved and made the decision to suspend Shadow, as well as private that chatroom so that its contents are hidden. It effectively makes that content completely inaccessible now, but I can say it wasn't hard-deleted (as in, this is not really an unprecedented hard-deletion of a chatroom).
Ah, I was trying to access the transcript page, which simply leads to a 404. It too should lead to a message like "there is a room here, but it's private".
Anyway, as was stated in the now-private chat room, he lost access to his public email account in February, but was still active on Discord at the time. I've messaged him there.
@EmmaBee Yeah. They arrived during a time when the room was quiet, and I don't think they ever returned. At least, they didn't respond to my reply.
Back in the day, many Python room regulars were in American time zones. But these days, most of us are in Europe or Australia. So it can be tricky for people who drop in during Americsn business hours.
@PM2Ring Yes I have seen a bit of the remarking about chat looking old. They are not wrong! But then also there was one comment (I'd link it but don't know how to search) where they commented that "it looks like old school IRC" and I was like "in a good way or not?", to which they said something like "In a good way, gives me faith in the internet again!" haha. Thought that was nice.
@PM2Ring Ahh that makes sense! Oof, how to handle getting a healthy spread across time zones.
@EmmaBee Yes, I saw that too. And I kind of expect coders to appreciate that kind of environment. Although a lot of coders work in a fancy IDE (Integrated Development Environment), with all the latest GUI enhancements, they should know how to work in a text-based environment.
On the note of chat looking perhaps a bit retro. It does seem like I keep seeing more examples of companies leaning into retro a bit more. One example, the Mozilla rebrand (I don't have an opinion on it being good or not), but they seem to be mixing modern/retro a bit: blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/mozilla-brand-next-era-of-tech
More companies are talking about "going back to their roots" so something is in the air
Besides, if you want to write userscripts or otherwise interact with chat via code, it's generally a lot easier if it's text-based rather than GUI-based.
Lots of people on the network have some coding skills, even outside the IT-oriented sites. Eg, one of the main mods on Physics.SE works as a programmer, not as a physicist, despite having a physics degree. Lots of us write little scripts & stuff for our own use, without bothering to share that code with the general public.
:) Took me a few minutes to find. FWIW, I searched for IRC with the chatserver/database-wide search tool for the each of the three databases (example for chat.SO)
Eg, I have a Python script that helps me create tables. It's not perfect, but it does the job, mostly. But I'd have to put in a lot more work to make it fit for general consumption. ;)
Last week, I was refreshing my memory on digital colour & gamma from Charles Poynton's site, http://poynton.ca/ Some of the info is a bit dated, but it's mostly still good. The site still looks pretty much the same as it did 20 years ago. He prides himself on using artisanal HTML
I'm going to loop in staff on that. For one, it's not entirely uncommon for posts to be deleted because users do not want such references to their past profiles, especially in combination with mentions of suspensions (even if it's just in a "don't speculate about this" note). Without knowing the wishes of the user involved, posting this was VERY unwise.
@Mast Compared to staff doing it? Regardless, I'm not sure why you're asking me... that's a question for @SonictheAnonymousHedgehog . That said, @Spevacus did state, "... his choice to delete his account" in this message.
I was using the previous Travel Meta post I linked above as the past case precedent for having such posts be acceptable on network metas as a whole. I also pinged the only mod here in this room at the time, and the only concern they brought up was about drama, which is why I added the note.
@SonictheAnonymousHedgehog There's more to consider with this case. The travel user was someone who passed away, and had no real moderation action taken against them prior to their departure. In this case, it's a bit different.
@cocomac Given some private info, yes. I'm for deleting it... With an "if some confirmation comes forward that such a post is appreciated, I fully support undeleting or even a plain repost (for attention)"
@cocomac I know. I've gotten complaints about deleting messages before (because it's not transparent when reading the transcript), so I stub it out with an edit to "delete" it while leaving its history intact for transparency.
Shadow Wizard has always been nice and helpful to me. I don't know exactly what happened but I saw the network ban. But he's a long-time colleague of many here, who will be missed.
I will say: The situation sucks. I'm sad about the whole thing. I'd appreciate if we recognized that, while we can speculate wildly, we refrain from doing so partially out of respect for Shadow and partially because there's really not much to base speculation off of. Remember Shadow fondly. I'm sure we all thank him for what he's done here as one of our longstanding members.
9
Now... Back to your regularly-scheduled Meta programming.
It is indeed best not to speculate on it. If they have an issue with the suspension, they can contact the Team about it. There's nothing for us to do about it.
@EmmaBee I wonder if the folks who just say "hi" and nothing else are waiting for others to reply/respond before they actually say something. But I've also seen the occasional user drop by TRPG General Chat who just says "hi", and then when someone responds, just starts making general small talk without actually having something to talk about.
I think it's more likely that they'll just say "hi" when no one's talking.
@EmmaBee Yeah, I think there's a balance to be struck. Keep things simple, but make some improvements. (Perhaps there could even be a choice between a basic UI and a more modern one, but I'm not sure if SO would want to deal with the overhead/extra work of maintaining 2 different UIs and saving a preference between them.)
@EmmaBee I don't recall exactly how it works in Stacks, but I've personally been a fan of the option to have both compact and standard UI (e.g., it displays normally, but there's a toggle to increase the information density, such as with Discord). It could still have modern components while not taking away information for folks that value the extra info.
@CPlus He got suspended for the next century and requested all his site profiles get deleted. Caused a lot of discussion, including regarding whether or not a "thank you"-type post on MSE was acceptable or not (one was posted, now it's deleted). That said...
I will say: The situation sucks. I'm sad about the whole thing. I'd appreciate if we recognized that, while we can speculate wildly, we refrain from doing so partially out of respect for Shadow and partially because there's really not much to base speculation off of. Remember Shadow fondly. I'm sure we all thank him for what he's done here as one of our longstanding members.
I thought century suspensions were reserved for like spammers and trolls and stuff. Not for users that have contributed to the site like since forever ago.
Hence, speculation. A portion of it was moved into the Trashcan room, as speculation on suspensions is generally frowned upon. Not going to be the one to copy it here, but if a mod thinks it's appropriate, this comment has some reasonable advice.
Update: I was just able to reach Shadow on Discord.
Yes, he did get indefinitely suspended network-wide prior to leaving the network. Due to its nature and to protect him, I will not be revealing any details regarding that here.
After the suspension, he requested to leave the network and remove all his accounts.
That's all the info he's given permission for me to give here.
He's also given permission for the "thanks" post to be republished - I asked him to contact a mod on Discord to verify it.