Skip to main content

Unanswered Questions

66 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers
7 votes
0 answers
158 views

Does the usage of the words "gnosis" and "episteme" evidentiate a change over time in Ancient Greek philosophy?

"Episteme" is the word of choice in Plato, generally (although there are a few instances of "Gnosis" here and there) By contrast, "Gnosis" is far more frequent among ...
3 votes
0 answers
69 views

Is for-itself simply in-itself-and-for-other in Hegel's Science of Logic?

I have been going through Hegel's Doctrine of Being, and have started rewriting it in my own words, as that usually helps me understand something. In so doing, I created a (new?) suffix: -in-itself-...
3 votes
0 answers
60 views

Seeking name of method for interpreting reality of phenomena as only a result or emanation of a more meaningful higher system/agent

I have noticed that a method of interpreting evidence according to a higher system/agent is important to some theology and philosophy - for example, Plato's theory of forms used to interpret material ...
3 votes
0 answers
117 views

Names for most popular taxonomies of informal fallacies?

Informal fallacies are not formal, so as might be expected, there exists no prevailing standard taxonomy. Various books on logic and logical fallacies organize fallacies differently (see chapter ...
3 votes
1 answer
86 views

Can logical assertions be read as not having some or any implications?

Is there a way to restrict the implication of a claim? In other words, is it possible to express truths in logic that do not have logical implications, and if so does this have a name in logic and ...
2 votes
0 answers
47 views

How to understand connecessity(?)?

Not quite following Messina and Rutherford[??], I assume that compossibility for propositions/factsF A and B is when: A, B are compossible when A ∧ B is possible. So I assume there is a slot to be ...
2 votes
0 answers
61 views

Is the mass/count-noun distinction the same as the continuous/discrete one?

Justification for this as a PhilosophySE questions: there are two SEP articles concerning this topic: The Logic of Mass Expressions (Nicolas[18]). The Metaphysics of Mass Expressions (Steen[22]). ...
2 votes
0 answers
78 views

"Truth" as a description of our cognition versus "truth" as a description of reality

In reading about the feud of foundationalism, infinitism and coherentism, there seems to be some arguments based on how cognition/reasoning works. However, an argument of the form (vaguely put by me) ...
2 votes
0 answers
36 views

What does meaning-scepticism mean?

I found the term in The Limits of Realism (Tim Button) (2013) on page 2: We are, then, looking for an argument that forces realists to consider semantic questions. A natural place to look is in the ...
2 votes
0 answers
41 views

What is the terminology to qualify things that are not reduced when shared (ideas vs physical objects)?

Is there a defined terminology to refer to things: Which gets "reduced" when shared: for example if I have 2 apples and I give you one, now I have one apple Which stays the same when shared:...
2 votes
0 answers
72 views

Are the terms formula and algorithm synonymous in formal logic?

How to do something in two or more steps would feel/grasped to me as pretty much matching the common usages of both terms, but to find possible nuances common in the philosophical literature in ...
2 votes
0 answers
537 views

What is the difference between world and universe?

I encounter the terms "world" and "universe" in various types of philosophy. I haven't paid close attention, but it seems "world" is used more phenomenologically and ...
2 votes
0 answers
143 views

The name for an anticipatory counter-argument?

There's the argument ad absurdum along with several other kind of reasoning. What is the name for a forestalling counter-argument - an argument put forward pre-emptively in anticipation of an ...
2 votes
0 answers
92 views

Which philosophy views "value" as the god?

What spiritual philosophy does Robert Lawrence Kuhn describe here? This view says that everything exists because of the value of the totality of universe.
2 votes
0 answers
158 views

Are many razors subsets of Occam's

Looking at the list of razors, it seems quite a few are defining which truth is simple and should be assumed rather than a different option. Be it conversational implication over semantic context, or ...

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5