Skip to content

Fix/oxlint2 #324

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 9, 2025
Merged

Fix/oxlint2 #324

merged 4 commits into from
May 9, 2025

Conversation

alexcoderabbitai
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 9, 2025

Walkthrough

The documentation was updated to standardize the capitalization of "Oxlint" across changelog and tool documentation files. The Oxlint documentation received further improvements, including updated links, an expanded list of supported file extensions, clarified configuration instructions, and minor wording adjustments for clarity and consistency.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
docs/changelog.md Standardized capitalization of "Oxlint" in entries for April 1 and April 8, 2025; no content changes beyond this.
docs/tools/oxlint.md Standardized "Oxlint" capitalization, updated URLs to official sources, expanded supported file extensions, clarified configuration instructions, removed rule configuration section, and made minor wording improvements.

Poem

In the docs, a hop and a skip,
"Oxlint" now stands with a capital tip.
Extensions abound, the links are all new,
Configs are clearer, and wording shines through.
With every small change, we tidy the warren—
Documentation bright as a springtime morn! 🐇✨

Tip

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching
  • CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.

Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Unit Tests

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Copy link

Deploying coderabbit-docs with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: aeb737b
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://8323f4d2.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://fix-oxlint2.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
docs/tools/oxlint.md (3)

19-29: Consider sorting or grouping supported file extensions
The new extensions (.mjs, .cjs, .mts, .cts, .vue, .astro, .svelte) are correctly added. For improved readability and maintenance, consider ordering this list alphabetically or grouping by language/runtime vs framework-specific extensions.


33-43: Refine configuration section phrasing and punctuation
There's a missing comma before the "as" clause on line 39, and the combined conditions are a bit dense. Consider adding punctuation or splitting into two sentences for clarity.

@@ line 39
- If no Oxlint config file is found and Biome is enabled, CodeRabbit will use Biome instead as Oxlint functionality is included within Biome.
+ If no Oxlint config file is found and Biome is enabled, CodeRabbit will use Biome instead, as Oxlint functionality is included within it.

Optionally, restructure to:

If no .oxlintrc.json file is found and Biome is enabled, CodeRabbit will defer to Biome. Otherwise, it will run Oxlint using the .oxlintrc.json configuration.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~39-~39: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...e is enabled, CodeRabbit will use Biome instead as Oxlint functionality is included wit...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


49-50: Update link label to reflect actual target
The first link directs to the GitHub releases page but is labeled as "Repository". Consider renaming it to "Oxlint GitHub Releases" or link to the repository root for consistency.

@@ line 49
- - [Oxlint GitHub Repository](https://github.com/oxc-project/oxc/releases/)
+ - [Oxlint GitHub Releases](https://github.com/oxc-project/oxc/releases/)
+ - [Oxlint GitHub Repository](https://github.com/oxc-project/oxc)
docs/changelog.md (1)

127-128: Harmonize bullet structure in "Additional Static Analysis Support"
The current list uses a past-tense action (“Added Oxlint”) rather than listing the tool name directly, which is inconsistent with other items. Consider renaming and consolidating nested bullets for clarity.

@@ line 126-128
- - SQLFluff
- Added Oxlint for faster linting
  - Oxlint is a blazingly fast JavaScript/TypeScript linter written in Rust
+ - SQLFluff
+ - **Oxlint**: A blazingly fast JavaScript/TypeScript linter written in Rust, up to 50–100× faster than ESLint
+   - Replaces ESLint for basic linting while preserving complex rule support

Alternatively, merge the nested point into the parent line to streamline the list.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3bd6ed9 and aeb737b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/changelog.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/tools/oxlint.md (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/tools/oxlint.md

[uncategorized] ~39-~39: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...e is enabled, CodeRabbit will use Biome instead as Oxlint functionality is included wit...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/tools/oxlint.md (2)

2-4: Frontmatter capitalization standardized
The title, sidebar label, and description now consistently use "Oxlint", matching our naming conventions.


13-13: Verify link and description clarity
The link to the Oxlint guide and the performance claim ("50-100x faster than ESLint") are accurate and informative. No issues here.

docs/changelog.md (1)

69-69: Consistent Oxlint capitalization
The Oxlint entry under "New Static Analysis Tools" is properly capitalized and well-described.

@alexcoderabbitai alexcoderabbitai merged commit 50a9d8f into main May 9, 2025
4 checks passed
@alexcoderabbitai alexcoderabbitai deleted the fix/oxlint2 branch May 9, 2025 17:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
1 participant